Cancer Medicine (Apr 2023)

KLRF1, a novel marker of CD56bright NK cells, predicts improved survival for patients with locally advanced bladder cancer

  • Neelam Mukherjee,
  • Niannian Ji,
  • Xi Tan,
  • Chun‐Liang Chen,
  • Onika D. V. Noel,
  • Maria Rodriguez‐Padron,
  • Chun‐Lin Lin,
  • David G. Alonzo,
  • Tim H. Huang,
  • Robert S. Svatek

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5579
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 7
pp. 8970 – 8980

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Bladder tumor‐infiltrating CD56bright NK cells are more tumor cytotoxic than their CD56dim counterparts. Identification of NK cell subsets is labor‐intensive and has limited utility in the clinical setting. Here, we sought to identify a surrogate marker of bladder CD56bright NK cells and to test its prognostic significance. Methods CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells were characterized with the multiparametric flow (n = 20) and mass cytometry (n = 21) in human bladder tumors. Transcriptome data from bladder tumors (n = 351) profiled by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were analyzed. The expression levels of individual markers in intratumoral CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells were visualized in tSNE plots. Expressions of activation markers were also compared between Killer Cell Lectin‐Like Receptor Subfamily F Member 1 (KLRF1)+ and KLRF1− NK cells. Results Intratumoral CD56bright NK cells displayed a more activated phenotype compared to the CD56dim subset. Multiple intratumoral cell types expressed CD56, including bladder tumor cells and nonspecific intratumoral CD56 expression was associated with worse patient survival. Thus, an alternative to CD56 as a marker of CD56bright NK cells was sought. The activation receptor KLRF1 was significantly increased on CD56bright but not on CD56dim NK cells. Intratumoral KLRF1+ NK cells were more activated and expressed higher levels of activation molecules compared with KLRF1− NK cells, analogous to the distinct effector function of NK cells across CD56 expression. High intratumoral KLRF1 was associated with improved recurrence‐free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, p = 0.01), cancer‐specific survival (HR 0.47, p = 0.02), and overall survival (HR 0.54, p = 0.02) on multivariable analyses that adjusted for clinical and pathologic variables. Conclusions KLRF1 is a promising prognostic marker in bladder cancer and may guide treatment decisions upon validation.

Keywords