Turkish Journal of Hematology (Nov 2016)

The Role of Azacitidine in the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Retrospective Multicenter Study

  • Anıl Tombak,
  • Mehmet Ali Uçar,
  • Aydan Akdeniz,
  • Eyüp Naci Tiftik,
  • Deniz Gören Şahin,
  • Olga Meltem Akay,
  • Murat Yıldırım,
  • Oral Nevruz,
  • Cem Kis,
  • Emel Gürkan,
  • Şerife Medeni Solmaz,
  • Mehmet Ali Özcan,
  • Rahşan Yıldırım,
  • İlhami Berber,
  • Mehmet Ali Erkurt,
  • Tülin Fıratlı Tuğlular,
  • Pınar Tarkun,
  • İrfan Yavaşoğlu,
  • Mehmet Hilmi Doğu,
  • İsmail Sarı,
  • Mustafa Merter,
  • Muhit Özcan,
  • Esra Yıldızhan,
  • Leylagül Kaynar,
  • Özgür Mehtap,
  • Ayşe Uysal,
  • Fahri Şahin,
  • Ozan Salim,
  • Mehmet Ali Sungur

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2015.0203
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 33, no. 4
pp. 273 – 280

Abstract

Read online

Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of azacitidine (AZA) in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including patients with >30% bone marrow (BM) blasts. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, 130 patients of ≥60 years old who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy or had progressed despite conventional treatment were included. Results: The median age was 73 years and 61.5% of patients had >30% BM blasts. Patients received AZA for a median of four cycles (range: 1-21). Initial overall response [including complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete recovery/partial remission] was 36.2%. Hematologic improvement (HI) of any kind was documented in 37.7% of all patients. HI was also documented in 27.1% of patients who were unresponsive to treatment.nMedian overall survival (OS) was 18 months for responders and 12 months for nonresponders (p=0.005). In the unresponsive patient group, any HI improved OS compared to patients without any HI (median OS was 14 months versus 10 months, p=0.068). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of <2, increasing number of AZA cycles (≥5 courses), and any HI predicted better OS. Age, AML type, and BM blast percentage had no impact. Conclusion: We conclude that AZA is effective and well tolerated in elderly comorbid AML patients, irrespective of BM blast count, and HI should be considered a sufficient response to continue treatment with AZA.

Keywords