Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (Jul 2020)

In situ measurement of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> from aircraft over northeast China and comparison with OCO-2 data

  • X. Sun,
  • X. Sun,
  • M. Duan,
  • M. Duan,
  • M. Duan,
  • Y. Gao,
  • R. Han,
  • R. Han,
  • D. Ji,
  • D. Ji,
  • W. Zhang,
  • N. Chen,
  • X. Xia,
  • X. Xia,
  • H. Liu,
  • Y. Huo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3595-2020
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13
pp. 3595 – 3607

Abstract

Read online

Several satellites have been launched to monitor the increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, especially CO2 and CH4 in the atmosphere, through backscattered hyperspectral radiance in the shortwave infrared (SWIR) band. The vertical profiles of greenhouse gases and aerosols could strongly affect the results from these instruments. To investigate the effects of the vertical distribution of CO2 on the uncertainty of SWIR satellite retrieval results, we conducted observations of the vertical profiles of CO2, CH4 and aerosol particles at 0.6–7 km above sea level using a Beechcraft King Air 350ER in Jiansanjiang (46.77∘ N, 131.99∘ E), Heilongjiang Province, northeast China, on 7–12 August 2018. The profiles from this aircraft captured a decrease in CO2 from 2 km to the minimum altitude due to the absorption of vegetation at the surface in summer. CH4 measurements showed about a 0.2 ppm increase from 2.0 to 0.6 km on 10 August, which may result from emissions from the large area of paddy fields below, and a constant mole fraction between 1.951 and 1.976 ppm was recorded at 2 km and above. Comparison of CO2 profiles from a new version of the carbon cycle data assimilation system Tan-Tracker (v1), retrievals from OCO-2 and aircraft measurements was conducted. The results from OCO-2 and the assimilation model system Tan-Tracker captured the vertical structure of CO2 above 3 km, whereas below 3 km the values from OCO-2 and the Tan-Tracker model were lower than those from in situ measurements. Column-averaged CO2 volume mole fractions calculated from in situ measurements showed biases of -4.68±0.44 ppm (-1.18±0.11%) compared to OCO-2 retrievals.