BJGP Open (Jul 2024)

Evaluating whether Prostate Cancer UK’s risk checker is a help or hindrance to prostate-specific antigen testing policy: a mixed-methods study

  • Natalia Norori,
  • Chiara de Biase,
  • Yui Hang Wong,
  • Sadie Robson Crabtree,
  • Matt Cox,
  • Esther Appleby,
  • Andrew Seggie,
  • Rachel Brown,
  • Amy Rylance

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0040
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 2

Abstract

Read online

Background: The UK has an informed choice testing policy for prostate cancer. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test is available for free to any man aged ≥50 years who requests it and has been informed of the harms and benefits. This policy leads to differences in PSA testing rates, which can exacerbate health inequalities. Aim: To assess whether Prostate Cancer UK’s risk checker helps men at risk of prostate cancer make an informed choice about the PSA test. Design & setting: Mixed-methods study in the UK. Method: In total, 1181 men at risk, their partners, and clinical experts participated in surveys, focus groups, and one-to-one interviews. Data on risk checker completions by sociodemographic factors were analysed over time. Data from general practices that sent the risk checker to their patients were collected and analysed for service monitoring purposes. Results: There was a strong assumption that testing must be good, and therefore a need to emphasise the pros and cons of the test and that having it was the patient’s decision. Men believed their GP would invite them for PSA testing. On the impact of the risk checker, 79.6% of men who completed it had at least one prostate cancer risk factor; the average time they interacted with the information in the tool was 9 minutes 28 seconds; and 75.7% felt the tool had equipped them to make an informed choice. Conclusion: Online decision-making tools, such as the risk checker, can help reach men at high risk of prostate cancer and support them in making an informed choice about the PSA test.

Keywords