Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular “Dr. Héctor Maldonado”, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET, Instituto de Fisiología y Biofísica “Dr. Bernardo Houssay” (IFIBIO-Houssay), Grupo de Neurociencia de Sistemas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Camila Lidia Zold
Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET, Instituto de Fisiología y Biofísica “Dr. Bernardo Houssay” (IFIBIO-Houssay), Grupo de Neurociencia de Sistemas, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Departamento de Fisiología, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Marcos Antonio Coletti
Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET, Instituto de Fisiología y Biofísica “Dr. Bernardo Houssay” (IFIBIO-Houssay), Grupo de Neurociencia de Sistemas, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Departamento de Fisiología, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET, Instituto de Fisiología y Biofísica “Dr. Bernardo Houssay” (IFIBIO-Houssay), Grupo de Neurociencia de Sistemas, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Departamento de Fisiología, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET, Instituto de Fisiología y Biofísica “Dr. Bernardo Houssay” (IFIBIO-Houssay), Grupo de Neurociencia de Sistemas, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Departamento de Fisiología, Buenos Aires, Argentina
The automatic initiation of actions can be highly functional. But occasionally these actions cannot be withheld and are released at inappropriate times, impulsively. Striatal activity has been shown to participate in the timing of action sequence initiation and it has been linked to impulsivity. Using a self-initiated task, we trained adult male rats to withhold a rewarded action sequence until a waiting time interval has elapsed. By analyzing neuronal activity we show that the striatal response preceding the initiation of the learned sequence is strongly modulated by the time subjects wait before eliciting the sequence. Interestingly, the modulation is steeper in adolescent rats, which show a strong prevalence of impulsive responses compared to adults. We hypothesize this anticipatory striatal activity reflects the animals’ subjective reward expectation, based on the elapsed waiting time, while the steeper waiting modulation in adolescence reflects age-related differences in temporal discounting, internal urgency states, or explore–exploit balance.