PLoS ONE (Jan 2013)

Oral anticoagulation therapy in heart failure patients in sinus rhythm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

  • Giuseppe Rengo,
  • Gennaro Pagano,
  • Alessandro Squizzato,
  • Lorenzo Moja,
  • Grazia Daniela Femminella,
  • Claudio de Lucia,
  • Klara Komici,
  • Valentina Parisi,
  • Gianluigi Savarese,
  • Nicola Ferrara,
  • Pasquale Perrone-Filardi,
  • Dario Leosco

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052952
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
p. e52952

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundHeart failure (HF) patients show high morbidity and mortality rate with increased risk of malignant arrhythmia and thromboembolism. Anticoagulation reduces embolic event and death rates in HF patients with atrial fibrillation, but if antithrombotic therapy is beneficial in patients with HF in sinus rhythm is still debated.Methodology and principal findingsWe conducted a systematic review of prospective, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulant therapies (OATs) compared to antiplatelet treatment in HF patients in sinus rhythm. MEDLINE, Web of Science, CENTRAL and Scopus databases were searched up to May 2012. Four RCTs were identified and a total of 3663 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with both ischemic and non-ischemic HF were included. There was no significant difference in mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.19) between OATs group and antiplatelet drug group. OATs have reduced ischemic stroke risk (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.74), but have increased major bleeding risk (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.88) compared to antiplatelet treatment.ConclusionIn HF patients in sinus rhythm OATs do not show a better risk-benefit profile compared to antiplatelet treatment in cardioembolism prevention. Warfarin and aspirin seem to be similar in reducing mortality. Warfarin reduces the incidence of ischemic stroke, but increases major bleedings. Thus, it is possible to speculate that aspirin prescription be indicated in patients with high risk of bleeding, whereas warfarin could be preferred in patients with high thromboembolic risk.