Effects of Oral Versus Intravenous Linezolid Administration on Treatment Effect and Incidence of Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Severe Infection

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with severe infection often require careful fluid management. Intravenous linezolid can increase the fluid volume, whereas oral linezolid can effectively limit the fluid volume. However, the differences in the treatment effect and incidence of thrombocytopenia between oral and intravenous linezolid in patients with severe infection remain unclear. Methods Patients who received linezolid in the intensive care unit of PLA General Hospital from December 2010 to December 2020 were divided into an oral group and intravenous group according to the route of administration, and we further established the PO group and PO-match group by propensity score matching. The anti-infection effect of linezolid and incidence of thrombocytopenia were compared between the two groups. Results In total, 177 patients were enrolled in the study (59 in PO group and 118 in PO-match group). The microbial clearance rate and clinical cure rate were similar between the two groups (70.0% vs. 79.3%, P = 0.293; 72.9% vs. 83.9%, P = 0.213). The 30-day mortality rate was slightly higher in the PO group than in the PO-match group, but the difference was not statistically significant (13.6% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.138). There was no difference in the incidence of thrombocytopenia between the two groups (62.7% vs. 65.3%, P = 0.739). Conclusions There were no significant differences in the treatment effect or incidence of thrombocytopenia between oral and intravenous administration of linezolid in patients with severe infection.

Keywords

• Oral vs. intravenous linezolid
• Severe infection
• Thrombocytopenia
• Treatment effect