BMJ Open (May 2022)

Interventions for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a scoping review of systematic reviews

  • Fiona Campbell,
  • Caroline Mitchell,
  • Priya Soma-Pillay,
  • Julie Balen,
  • Anthea Sutton,
  • Emmanuel Amabebe,
  • Shumona Salam,
  • Shamanthi Maya Jayasooriya,
  • Bronwen M Gillespie,
  • Kerry Parris,
  • Lawrence Chauke,
  • Brenda Narice,
  • Dilichukwu O Anumba

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052576
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 5

Abstract

Read online

Background Globally, 11% of babies are born preterm each year. Preterm birth (PTB) is a leading cause of neonatal death and under-five mortality and morbidity, with lifelong sequelae in those who survive. PTB disproportionately impacts low/middle-income countries (LMICs) where the burden is highest.Objectives This scoping review sought to the evidence for interventions that reduce the risk of PTB, focusing on the evidence from LMICs and describing how context is considered in evidence synthesis.Design We conducted a scoping review, to describe this wide topic area. We searched five electronic databases (2009–2020) and contacted experts to identify relevant systematic reviews of interventions to reduce the risk of PTB. We included published systematic reviews that examined the effectiveness of interventions and their effect on reducing the risk of PTB. Data were extracted and is described narratively.Results 139 published systematic reviews were included in the review. Interventions were categorised as primary or secondary. The interventions where the results showed a greater effect size and consistency across review findings included treatment of syphilis and vaginal candidiasis, vitamin D supplementation and cervical cerclage. Included in the 139 reviews were 1372 unique primary source studies. 28% primary studies were undertaken in LMIC contexts and only 4.5% undertaken in a low-income country (LIC) Only 10.8% of the reviews sought to explore the impact of context on findings, and 19.4% reviews did not report the settings or the primary studies.Conclusion This scoping review highlights the lack of research evidence derived from contexts where the burden of PTB globally is greatest. The lack of rigour in addressing contextual applicability within systematic review methods is also highlighted. This presents a risk of inappropriate and unsafe recommendations for practice within these contexts. It also highlights a need for primary research, developing and testing interventions in LIC settings.