Materials Research Express (Jan 2020)

Enhanced mechanical properties are possible with urethane dimethacrylate-based experimental restorative dental composite

  • Aftab Ahmed Khan,
  • Abdulaziz Abdullah AlKhureif,
  • Badreldin A Mohamed,
  • Leonel S J Bautista

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abbf7f
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 10
p. 105307

Abstract

Read online

This laboratory study aimed to replace the traditional bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate ( bis GMA) resin system with a urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA)-based resin system to enhance the physicomechanical properties of dental restorative composite (DRC). We evaluated surface roughness, porosity %, nanohardness, elastic modulus, and compressive strength (CS) in the control group (the bis GMA-resin system) and two experimental groups (UDMA-based resin systems with 20 wt.% SiO _2 or Al _2 O _3 , each 30 μ m in size spherical fillers). Cylindrically shaped samples 4 mm in diameter and 6 mm in height were fabricated using light curing (n = 10). One-way analysis of variance method was used to statistically analyze the results (p ≤ 0.05). The data suggest that both UDMA-based resin systems showed increased surface roughness (R _a ) and porosity % in the sample fabrication compared with the control. However, the nanohardness in both SiO _2 -based UDMA composite (0.20 ± 0.09 GPa) and Al _2 O _3 -based UDMA composite (0.22 ± 0.07 GPa) was not significantly higher compared with the control (0.19 ± 0.05 GPa). Likewise, while improved CS values were observed in both SiO _2 -based UDMA composite (15.5 ± 1.9 MPa) and Al _2 O _3 -based UDMA composite (16.2 ± 0.7 MPa) compared to the control (14.5 ± 4.5 MPa), this increase was not statistically significant. The newly developed UDMA-based resin formulation with Al _2 O _3 micro-filler showed promising physicomechanical properties and may be appropriate for use as DRC.

Keywords