Quaternary Science Advances (Sep 2024)

Holocene alluvial dynamics, soil erosion and settlement in the uplands of Macedonia (Greece): New geoarchaeological insights from Xerolakkos in Grevena

  • Giannis Apostolou,
  • Alfredo Mayoral,
  • Konstantina Venieri,
  • Sofia Dimaki,
  • Arnau Garcia-Molsosa,
  • Mercourios Georgiadis,
  • Hector A. Orengo

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15
p. 100206

Abstract

Read online

This paper addresses the interplay between Holocene landscape evolution and human settlement dynamics, drawing new evidence from the alluvial history of Xerolakkos, a continental stream in Grevena (Western Macedonia, Greece). We developed an integrated geoarchaeological survey combining remote sensing geomorphological mapping, litho-stratigraphic analysis and radiocarbon dating with the site evidence of a new archaeological survey. Results revealed four major alluviation phases, corresponding to 1) the beginning of the Holocene until the Early Neolithic (∼6300/6200 BCE), 2) the end of the Early and the Middle Neolithic (∼6000–5400 BCE), 3) from the Middle Bronze Age to the Late Roman period (∼1800 BCE – 500 CE), and 4) during the Byzantine and Ottoman eras (∼500–1800 CE), all separated by phases of floodplain incision. Furthermore, the effects of several Holocene Rapid Climatic Changes (RCC) are traced and discussed together with potential human responses; we also provide the first alluvial sequence recording the ∼6200 BCE (8.2 kyr BP) event in the Balkans. While the climate and the local geomorphological setting are considered the primary drivers behind instability and erosion during the Early and Middle Holocene, a landscape change starting in the Middle Bronze Age (after ∼1800 BCE) followed by a re-organisation of the rural economy in the Roman period suggests the increasing involvement of anthropogenic forcing which, by the Ottoman period, evolved into a dynamic situation between climatic variability and adaptive land management. Finally, we demonstrate how soil erosion in the upper catchment constitutes a serious taphonomic bias when studying the regional archaeological record.

Keywords