PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Radiomics and machine learning of multisequence multiparametric prostate MRI: Towards improved non-invasive prostate cancer characterization.

  • Jussi Toivonen,
  • Ileana Montoya Perez,
  • Parisa Movahedi,
  • Harri Merisaari,
  • Marko Pesola,
  • Pekka Taimen,
  • Peter J Boström,
  • Jonne Pohjankukka,
  • Aida Kiviniemi,
  • Tapio Pahikkala,
  • Hannu J Aronen,
  • Ivan Jambor

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217702
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 7
p. e0217702

Abstract

Read online

PurposeTo develop and validate a classifier system for prediction of prostate cancer (PCa) Gleason score (GS) using radiomics and texture features of T2-weighted imaging (T2w), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) acquired using high b values, and T2-mapping (T2).MethodsT2w, DWI (12 b values, 0-2000 s/mm2), and T2 data sets of 62 patients with histologically confirmed PCa were acquired at 3T using surface array coils. The DWI data sets were post-processed using monoexponential and kurtosis models, while T2w was standardized to a common scale. Local statistics and 8 different radiomics/texture descriptors were utilized at different configurations to extract a total of 7105 unique per-tumor features. Regularized logistic regression with implicit feature selection and leave pair out cross validation was used to discriminate tumors with 3+3 vs >3+3 GS.ResultsIn total, 100 PCa lesions were analysed, of those 20 and 80 had GS of 3+3 and >3+3, respectively. The best model performance was obtained by selecting the top 1% features of T2w, ADCm and K with ROC AUC of 0.88 (95% CI of 0.82-0.95). Features from T2 mapping provided little added value. The most useful texture features were based on the gray-level co-occurrence matrix, Gabor transform, and Zernike moments.ConclusionTexture feature analysis of DWI, post-processed using monoexponential and kurtosis models, and T2w demonstrated good classification performance for GS of PCa. In multisequence setting, the optimal radiomics based texture extraction methods and parameters differed between different image types.