Frontiers in Psychology (May 2024)

The mechanism of phonetic information in voice identity discrimination: a comparative study based on sighted and blind people

  • Lili Ming,
  • Lili Ming,
  • Libo Geng,
  • Libo Geng,
  • Xinyu Zhao,
  • Xinyu Zhao,
  • Yichan Wang,
  • Yichan Wang,
  • Na Hu,
  • Yiming Yang,
  • Yiming Yang,
  • Xueping Hu,
  • Xueping Hu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1352692
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine whether phonetic information functions and how phonetic information affects voice identity processing in blind people.MethodTo address the first inquiry, 25 normal sighted participants and 30 blind participants discriminated voice identity, when listening forward speech and backward speech from their own native language and another unfamiliar language. To address the second inquiry, combining articulatory suppression paradigm, 26 normal sighted participants and 26 blind participants discriminated voice identity, when listening forward speech from their own native language and another unfamiliar language.ResultsIn Experiment 1, not only in the voice identity discrimination task with forward speech, but also in the discrimination task with backward speech, both the sighted and blind groups showed the superiority of the native language. This finding supports the view that backward speech still retains some phonetic information, and indicates that phonetic information can affect voice identity processing in sighted and blind people. In addition, only the superiority of the native language of sighted people was regulated by the speech manner, which is related to articulatory rehearsal. In Experiment 2, only the superiority of the native language of sighted people was regulated by articulatory suppression. This indicates that phonetic information may act in different ways on voice identity processing in sighted and blind people.ConclusionThe heightened dependence on voice source information in blind people appears not to undermine the function of phonetic information, but it appears to change the functional mechanism of phonetic information. These findings suggest that the present phonetic familiarity model needs to be improved with respect to the mechanism of phonetic information.

Keywords