ON A CONTEMPORARY CONTRADICTION IN THE USE OF THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGES IN STUDENTS ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTS

Abstract

The study addresses the reasons for and the mechanism and possible negative consequences of using an incomplete 3D image, which does not give a full 3D picture of the designed building. By main general view, we mean the visual frame of a perspective view from a pedestrian position. The following methods of creating a complete 3D image are compared: perspective bird's-eye view and axonometry. These are also comparable to a physical model in terms of the degree of objectivity of perception. It is shown how the placement of the main 3D image in the design graphics on the presentation boards impairs readability, the essential quality of any layout. The reason for this situation is associated with the use of computer 3D modeling and its ability to influence viewer’s emotions. It affects the rational perception of a design and does not allow one to adequately assess the level of professional thinking in a student. Other related impairments are highlighted. It is shown how this range of methodological fallacies, in both professional and academic environments, can lead to violations of professional ethics and affect the technical rigor of the architecture student. Altogether, the above can ultimately downgrade the professional culture. It is concluded that it is necessary to assess the situation that has arisen in the recent years and adjust relevant technical guidelines in the era of digital design.

Keywords

• axonometry
• perspective view
• readability
• architectural design presentation