Performance and Health Parameters of Sows and Their Litters Using a Probiotic Supplement Composed of <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 541 and <i>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</i> 516
Aline Maria Silva Barbosa,
Maria Paula Souza Carvalho,
Luciana de Paula Naves,
Stephane Alverina Briguente da Motta,
Rhuan Filipe Chaves,
Maíra Resende,
Daniele de Lima,
Lea Hübertz Birch Hansen,
Vinícius de Souza Cantarelli
Affiliations
Aline Maria Silva Barbosa
Faculty of Medicine Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil
Maria Paula Souza Carvalho
Faculty of Medicine Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil
Luciana de Paula Naves
Faculty of Medicine Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil
Stephane Alverina Briguente da Motta
Faculty of Medicine Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil
Rhuan Filipe Chaves
Animalnutri Ciência e Tecnologia, José de Santana, Centro, 520, Patos de Minas 38700-052, MG, Brazil
Maíra Resende
Animalnutri Ciência e Tecnologia, José de Santana, Centro, 520, Patos de Minas 38700-052, MG, Brazil
Daniele de Lima
Novonesis, Animal Biosolutions, Sales 13278-327, SP, Brazil
Lea Hübertz Birch Hansen
Novonesis, Animal Biosolutions, Business Unit, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Vinícius de Souza Cantarelli
Faculty of Medicine Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras 37200-000, MG, Brazil
This study investigated the efficacy of using probiotics on the performance and health parameters of sows and their litters. A randomized block design was used with 584 sows and 292 replications, with two dietary treatments: the control group (basal diet without probiotics) and the probiotic group (basal diet supplemented with 400 g/ton of a probiotic composed of Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) 541 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (B. amyloliquefaciens) 516). Feed intake was evaluated throughout the experimental period. Bodyweight and backfat thickness of the sows were measured at the beginning and end of each phase. Piglets were weighed individually at birth and at weaning. Performance variables and physiological parameters were analyzed. Sows that received the probiotic supplement exhibited increased milk production (p = 0.05) and bodyweight loss, along with reduced postpartum cortisol levels (p p p p p p Lactobacillus sp. They also had higher (p < 0.05) concentration of fecal myeloperoxidase (MPO) close to weaning and improved ileal histomorphometric measures. In conclusion, supplementation with the probiotic product improves performance and promotes health parameters of the sows their litters.