Comparing the performance of DeoxyriboNucleic Acid methylation analysis and cytology for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in women with high-risk human papillomavirus-positive status in a gynecologic outpatient population

Abstract

Abstract Background Primary screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with cytological triage for women with non-16/18 hrHPV-positive status has become popular in China. However, cytology relies on the subjective judgment of pathologists, leading to inconsistent clinical performance. Methods A total of 657 hrHPV-positive women aged 25–64 years were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All participants underwent colposcopic biopsy after cytology triage, with cytology residual specimens undergoing DNA methylation testing. CIN2+ and CIN3+ sensitivity and specificity were compared between the different triage strategies (n=487): PAX1 methylation (PAX1 m ) , Glycophorin C methylation (GYPC m ), cytology, and combinations between them or with HPV16/18. Results The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for PAX1 m and GYPC m in detecting CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) were 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796–0.937) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.808–0.938), respectively. The sensitivities of PAX1 m and GYPC m were consistent with those of cytology for both CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection. The relative specificities of PAX1 m and GYPC m for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 2.83 (95% CI: 2.33–2.45) and 3.09 (95% CI: 2.40–3.98), respectively. The relative specificities of combining HPV 16/18 with PAX1 m and GYPC m for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 3.38 (95% CI: 2.96–3.86) and 3.67 (95% CI: 3.15–4.27), respectively. Compared to low levels of DNA methylation, high levels of PAX1 m and GYPC m resulted in odd ratios (ORs) of 57.66 (95% CI: 13.57–409.12, p < 0.001) and 23.87 (95% CI: 6.49–115.42, p < 0.001) for CIN3+, adjusted for HPV 16/18 and cytology results. Conclusions PAX1 m and GYPC m demonstrated superior ability to identify cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer, with AUC values exceeding 0.85. For detecting CIN2+/CIN3+ in women with hrHPV-positive status, DNA methylation (combined with HPV 16/18) showed higher specificity than cytology (combined with HPV 16/18) and is a potential molecular biomarker for detecting cervical (pre)cancer.

Keywords

• PAX1 methylation
• GYPC methylation
• DNA methylation
• Cervical cancer
• Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
• High-risk human papillomavirus