Scientific Reports (Jul 2023)

Volumetric capnography and return of spontaneous circulation in an experimental model of pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest

  • Sara de la Mata Navazo,
  • Gema Manrique,
  • Sarah Nicole Fernández,
  • Gema Pérez,
  • Laura Butragueño‑Laiseca,
  • Miriam García,
  • María Slöcker,
  • Rafael González,
  • Laura Herrera,
  • Santiago Mencía,
  • Jimena del Castillo,
  • María José Solana,
  • Débora Sanz,
  • Raquel Cieza,
  • Jorge López,
  • Alicia Rodríguez Martínez,
  • María José Santiago,
  • Javier Urbano,
  • Jesús López‑Herce

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37827-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 1 – 6

Abstract

Read online

Abstract A secondary analysis of a randomized study was performed to study the relationship between volumetric capnography (VCAP) and arterial CO2 partial pressure (PCO2) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to analyze the ability of these parameters to predict the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in a pediatric animal model of asphyxial cardiac arrest (CA). Asphyxial CA was induced by sedation, muscle relaxation and extubation. CPR was started 2 min after CA occurred. Airway management was performed with early endotracheal intubation or bag-mask ventilation, according to randomization group. CPR was continued until ROSC or 24 min of resuscitation. End-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), CO2 production (VCO2), and EtCO2/VCO2/kg ratio were continuously recorded. Seventy-nine piglets were included, 26 (32.9%) of whom achieved ROSC. EtCO2 was the best predictor of ROSC (AUC 0.72, p < 0.01 and optimal cutoff point of 21.6 mmHg). No statistical differences were obtained regarding VCO2, VCO2/kg and EtCO2/VCO2/kg ratios. VCO2 and VCO2/kg showed an inverse correlation with PCO2, with a higher correlation coefficient as resuscitation progressed. EtCO2 also had an inverse correlation with PCO2 from minute 18 to 24 of resuscitation. Our findings suggest that EtCO2 is the best VCAP-derived parameter for predicting ROSC. EtCO2 and VCO2 showed an inverse correlation with PCO2. Therefore, these parameters are not adequate to measure ventilation during CPR.