Balloonless spinning spindle head shape optimisation

Abstract

The article presents a procedure for assessing and selecting the shape of the ring spinner spindle head that is optimum for yarn manufacturing using the balloonless system, considering multiple criteria. This procedure consists of two stages: the Pareto-optimal method and the distance function method. Twelve spindle head variants were designed and manufactured of 100Cr6 bearing steel composed of C (0.93–1.05%), Si (0.15–0.35%), Mn (0.25–0.45%) along with aluminium alloys EN AW-6060 (AlSi1MgMn) containing Si (0.70–1.3%), Mg (0.6–1.2%), Mn (0.4–1.0%) and EN AW-6060 (AlMgSi) containing Si (0.30–0.60%) and Mg (0.35–0.60%). The shapes of the heads were developed on the basis of the design solutions used previously by the leading ring-spinning machine and spinning spindle manufacturers. Four design variants of spindle heads, made of AlMgSi wrought aluminium alloy, have a unique shape that enables shaping their teeth (notches) by extrusion on a hydraulic press. The assessment criteria were production cost per unit, head weight, maximum surface hardness HV0.1, and four yarn technological quality criteria: maximum yarn tension values during the formation of the base, body and head of the package, and the tension amplitude. The assessment values for the criteria obtained through calculations and measurements were normalized. Then, a set of Pareto-optimal solutions was determined using seven criteria. Due to the fact that this set consisted of six variants, the distance function was used to select the best one. The best design variant of the head is the one corresponding to the lowest distance function value. In our case, the variant is a unique shape, made of AlMgSi alloy, with teeth thickened on the outer diameter of the head, ensuring the lowest yarn tension value at the height during the formation of the package.

Keywords

• multi-objective optimisation
• balloon-less spinning spindle head
• ring-spinning machine
• optimisation
• manufacturing processes
• manufacturing cost
• product quality