Screw-and-cement–retained prosthesis versus cement-retained prosthesis: Which is more appropriate for the upper premolar area?

Abstract

Background/purpose: The narrow alveolar ridge in the maxillary premolars area limits the angle of implant placement and the shape of the prosthesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate which implant prosthesis, screw-and-cement-retained prosthesis (SCRP) or cement-retained prosthesis (CRP), was more suitable for the maxillary premolar area. Materials and methods: We conducted virtual implantation on 58 implant images from 47 patients obtained using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The width and buccal inclination of the alveolar bone, the angulation of the implant fixture, and the angulation of abutment were measured and calculated. Results: We determined that SCRP was feasible in 52% and 78.8% of first and second premolar areas, respectively. There was a positive relationship between the feasibility of SCRP and the premolar region in general (P = 0.031), although SCRP was more likely to be a possibility in the second premolar area. On multiple logistic regression analysis, the difference in the angle between the axis of the prosthesis and the axis of the alveolar bone (RA) was significantly associated with the type of prosthesis (P = 0.001). The RA was significantly higher for CRP implants (OR = 1.885; 95% CI: 1.31 to 2.70). Conclusion: SCRP is not always feasible in the maxillary premolar area, especially in the first premolar area. If the difference between the angle of the axis of the prosthesis and the axis of the alveolar bone is large, it may be necessary for the clinician to consider CRP in the treatment planning stage.

Keywords

• Dental implant
• Screw-and-cement-retained prosthesis
• Upper premolar