Arthroplasty Today (Jun 2022)

Location of Initial Closed Reduction Attempt Significantly Increases Cost and Length of Stay in Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Eric S. Dilbone, MD,
  • Stephanie N. Moore-Lotridge, PhD,
  • Michael Gabbard, MD,
  • Jacob D. Schultz, MD,
  • Andrew B. Rees, MD,
  • J. Ryan Martin, MD,
  • Gregory G. Polkowski, MD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15
pp. 102 – 107

Abstract

Read online

Background: Prosthetic hip dislocation remains one of the most frequent complications following total hip replacement. Dislocations are predominantly managed by a closed reduction in the emergency department (ED) or the operating room (OR). This study aimed to evaluate how the location of an initial closed reduction attempt impacts a patient's course of care including length of stay (LOS) and cost of care. Material and methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients presenting to a single ED with a unilateral prosthetic hip dislocation from 2009 to 2019. A total of 108 patients were identified. Data collected included patient demographics, ED/hospital course, and hospital charges. Results: Seventy-four patients (69%) had initial reduction attempted in the ED (65/74, 88% were successful), while 34 patients (31%) went directly to OR (100% successful with closed reduction). Failed closed reduction in ED or direct to OR resulted in a greater LOS and rate of placement to a skilled nursing facility following discharge. Median hospital charges for successful ED reduction were $6,837, while failed ED closed reduction or direct to OR resulted in median charges of $27,317 and $20,481, respectively. Conclusion: Many patients successfully underwent closed reduction in the ED, and there was no difference in complications, independent of where the reduction was first performed. Patients undergoing reduction in the OR had greater LOS and cost of care, independent of whether a reduction attempt was performed and failed in the ED, than those successfully reduced in the ED.

Keywords