BMC Biology (Jun 2021)
Large-scale genomic analysis reveals the genetic cost of chicken domestication
- Ming-Shan Wang,
- Jin-Jin Zhang,
- Xing Guo,
- Ming Li,
- Rachel Meyer,
- Hidayat Ashari,
- Zhu-Qing Zheng,
- Sheng Wang,
- Min-Sheng Peng,
- Yu Jiang,
- Mukesh Thakur,
- Chatmongkon Suwannapoom,
- Ali Esmailizadeh,
- Nalini Yasoda Hirimuthugoda,
- Moch Syamsul Arifin Zein,
- Szilvia Kusza,
- Hamed Kharrati-Koopaee,
- Lin Zeng,
- Yun-Mei Wang,
- Ting-Ting Yin,
- Min-Min Yang,
- Ming-Li Li,
- Xue-Mei Lu,
- Emiliano Lasagna,
- Simone Ceccobelli,
- Humpita Gamaralalage Thilini Nisanka Gunwardana,
- Thilina Madusanka Senasig,
- Shao-Hong Feng,
- Hao Zhang,
- Abul Kashem Fazlul Haque Bhuiyan,
- Muhammad Sajjad Khan,
- Gamamada Liyanage Lalanie Pradeepa Silva,
- Le Thi Thuy,
- Okeyo A. Mwai,
- Mohamed Nawaz Mohamed Ibrahim,
- Guojie Zhang,
- Kai-Xing Qu,
- Olivier Hanotte,
- Beth Shapiro,
- Mirte Bosse,
- Dong-Dong Wu,
- Jian-Lin Han,
- Ya-Ping Zhang
Affiliations
- Ming-Shan Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Jin-Jin Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Xing Guo
- College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University
- Ming Li
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University
- Rachel Meyer
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz
- Hidayat Ashari
- Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Science (LIPI)
- Zhu-Qing Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, The Cooperative Innovation Center for Sustainable Pig Production, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University
- Sheng Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Min-Sheng Peng
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Yu Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University
- Mukesh Thakur
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Chatmongkon Suwannapoom
- School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Phayao
- Ali Esmailizadeh
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Nalini Yasoda Hirimuthugoda
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Moch Syamsul Arifin Zein
- Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Science (LIPI)
- Szilvia Kusza
- Institute of Animal Husbandry, Biotechnology and Nature Conservation, University of Debrecen
- Hamed Kharrati-Koopaee
- Department of Animal Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
- Lin Zeng
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Yun-Mei Wang
- Center for Neurobiology and Brain Restoration, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
- Ting-Ting Yin
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Min-Min Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Ming-Li Li
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Xue-Mei Lu
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Emiliano Lasagna
- Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentarie Ambientali, University of Perugia
- Simone Ceccobelli
- Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentarie Ambientali, University of Perugia
- Humpita Gamaralalage Thilini Nisanka Gunwardana
- Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna
- Thilina Madusanka Senasig
- Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna
- Shao-Hong Feng
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Hao Zhang
- Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Ministry of Agriculture of China
- Abul Kashem Fazlul Haque Bhuiyan
- Bangladesh Agricultural University
- Muhammad Sajjad Khan
- Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences
- Gamamada Liyanage Lalanie Pradeepa Silva
- Department of Animal Science, University of Peradeniya
- Le Thi Thuy
- National Institute of Animal Husbandry
- Okeyo A. Mwai
- Livestock Genetics Program, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
- Mohamed Nawaz Mohamed Ibrahim
- Livestock Genetics Program, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
- Guojie Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Kai-Xing Qu
- Yunnan Academy of Grassland and Animal Science
- Olivier Hanotte
- Cells, Organisms and Molecular Genetics, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham
- Beth Shapiro
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California Santa Cruz
- Mirte Bosse
- Wageningen University & Research - Animal Breeding and Genomics
- Dong-Dong Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Jian-Lin Han
- CAAS-ILRI Joint Laboratory on Livestock and Forage Genetic Resources, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS)
- Ya-Ping Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Yunnan Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Domestic Animals, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01052-x
- Journal volume & issue
-
Vol. 19,
no. 1
pp. 1 – 16
Abstract
Abstract Background Species domestication is generally characterized by the exploitation of high-impact mutations through processes that involve complex shifting demographics of domesticated species. These include not only inbreeding and artificial selection that may lead to the emergence of evolutionary bottlenecks, but also post-divergence gene flow and introgression. Although domestication potentially affects the occurrence of both desired and undesired mutations, the way wild relatives of domesticated species evolve and how expensive the genetic cost underlying domestication is remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated the demographic history and genetic load of chicken domestication. Results We analyzed a dataset comprising over 800 whole genomes from both indigenous chickens and wild jungle fowls. We show that despite having a higher genetic diversity than their wild counterparts (average π, 0.00326 vs. 0.00316), the red jungle fowls, the present-day domestic chickens experienced a dramatic population size decline during their early domestication. Our analyses suggest that the concomitant bottleneck induced 2.95% more deleterious mutations across chicken genomes compared with red jungle fowls, supporting the “cost of domestication” hypothesis. Particularly, we find that 62.4% of deleterious SNPs in domestic chickens are maintained in heterozygous states and masked as recessive alleles, challenging the power of modern breeding programs to effectively eliminate these genetic loads. Finally, we suggest that positive selection decreases the incidence but increases the frequency of deleterious SNPs in domestic chicken genomes. Conclusion This study reveals a new landscape of demographic history and genomic changes associated with chicken domestication and provides insight into the evolutionary genomic profiles of domesticated animals managed under modern human selection.
Keywords