Wisconsin Institutionalism, Public Persuasion, and Public Science

Abstract

This paper makes use of the wealth of materials left by Wisconsin institutionalists to consider how they thought about economics as public science and as public persuasion. Considered is how the philosophy of pragmatism and an emphasis on empiricism manifested in economics practice at Wisconsin. To understand why the empirical method—encompassing field studies, data collection and organization, and case studies—was so important to the Wisconsin institutionalists requires recognizing that their work was empirical in a very specific way. The Wisconsin economists chose their studies with definite reform goals in mind—reforms that could be achieved either through regulatory changes or by a change of law. They engaged in constructive research—research specifically designed to identify problems and potential solutions. That the Wisconsin institutionalists generated substantial amounts of materials that repeatedly demonstrated the same findings was an artifact of what they wanted to accomplish.

Keywords

• Wisconsin institutionalism
• Commons (John R.)
• Ely (Richard T.)
• field work
• persuasion
• policymaking