Frontiers in Psychology (Jan 2023)

Standardization of the Italian ALS-CBS™ Caregiver Behavioral Questionnaire

  • Edoardo Nicolò Aiello,
  • Edoardo Nicolò Aiello,
  • Federica Solca,
  • Lucia Catherine Greco,
  • Lucia Catherine Greco,
  • Antonino La Tona,
  • Silvia Torre,
  • Laura Carelli,
  • Claudia Morelli,
  • Alberto Doretti,
  • Eleonora Colombo,
  • Stefano Messina,
  • Debora Pain,
  • Alice Radici,
  • Andrea Lizio,
  • Jacopo Casiraghi,
  • Federica Cerri,
  • Agostino Brugnera,
  • Angelo Compare,
  • Susan Woolley,
  • Jennifer Murphy,
  • Lucio Tremolizzo,
  • Ildebrando Appollonio,
  • Federico Verde,
  • Federico Verde,
  • Valeria Ada Sansone,
  • Valeria Ada Sansone,
  • Christian Lunetta,
  • Vincenzo Silani,
  • Vincenzo Silani,
  • Nicola Ticozzi,
  • Nicola Ticozzi,
  • Barbara Poletti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1107001
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe present investigation aimed at testing the psychometrics and diagnostics of the Italian version of the Caregiver Behavioral Questionnaire (CBQ) from the ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS™), as well as its case–control discrimination, in a cohort of non-demented patients with ALS.MethodsThe caregivers of N = 265 non-demented patients with ALS and N = 99 healthy controls (HCs) were administered the CBQ and the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen-Carer Interview (ECAS-CI). For N = 98 patients, an in-depth behavioural/psychopathological assessment via the Frontal Behavioural Inventory (FBI), the Dimensional Apathy Scale (DAS), the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory-Form Y (STAI-Y), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was also available. Factorial and construct validity, internal reliability, and diagnostics against an abnormal ECAS-CI score were tested in patients. Case–control discrimination was explored through logistic regression.ResultsThe CBQ was internally reliable (McDonald’s ω = 0.90) and underpinned by a simple, unidimensional structure; it converged with ECAS-CI, FBI, and DAS scores and diverged from STAI-Y and BDI ones. A cutoff of ≤ 33 accurately detected abnormal ECAS-CI scores (AUC = 0.85), yielding optimal error- and information-based diagnostics. The CBQ was independent of demographic and disease-related variables and discriminated patients from HCs (p < 0.001).DiscussionThe Italian version of the CBQ from the ALS-CBS™ is a valid, reliable, diagnostically sound, and feasible screener for detecting frontotemporal-like behavioural changes in non-demented patients with ALS. Its adoption is thus recommended within clinical practice and research in the view of providing preliminary information on whether the administration of more extensive behavioural instruments is needed.

Keywords