Continuous Eddy Simulation (CES) of Transonic Shock-Induced Flow Separation

Abstract

Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS), large eddy simulation (LES), and hybrid RANS-LES, first of all wall-modeled LES (WMLES) and detached eddy simulation (DES) methods, are regularly applied for wall-bounded turbulent flow simulations. Their characteristic advantages and disadvantages are well known: significant challenges arise from simulation performance, computational cost, and functionality issues. This paper describes the application of a new simulation approach: continuous eddy simulation (CES). CES is based on exact mathematics, and it is a minimal error method. Its functionality is different from currently applied simulation concepts. Knowledge of the actual amount of flow resolution enables the model to properly adjust to simulations by increasing or decreasing its contribution. The flow considered is a high Reynolds number complex flow, the Bachalo–Johnson axisymmetric transonic bump flow, which is often applied to evaluate the performance of turbulence models. A thorough analysis of simulation performance, computational cost, and functionality features of the CES model applied is presented in comparison with corresponding features of RANS, DES, WMLES, and wall-resolved LES (WRLES). We conclude that CES performs better than RANS, DES, WMLES, and even WRLES at a little fraction of computational cost applied for the latter methods. CES is independent of usual functionality requirements of other methods, which offers relevant additional advantages.

Keywords

• computational fluid dynamics
• large eddy simulation (LES)
• Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods
• hybrid RANS-LES methods