Dementia & Neuropsychologia (Apr 2022)

Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches

  • Laiss Bertola,
  • Isabela Judith Martins Benseñor,
  • Andre Russowsky Brunoni,
  • Paulo Caramelli,
  • Sandhi Maria Barreto,
  • Arlinda Barbosa Moreno,
  • Rosane Harter Griep,
  • Maria Carmen Viana,
  • Paulo Andrade Lotufo,
  • Claudia Kimie Suemoto

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2021-0027
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 2
pp. 171 – 180

Abstract

Read online Read online

ABSTRACT. Repeated cognitive assessment in longitudinal studies favors the occurrence of retest effects, usually increasing the scores obtained at the follow-up assessments when compared to baseline. Therefore, retest effects can compromise the evaluation of cognitive decline in older adults. Objectives: We aimed to verify the occurrence of the retest effect and the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the follow-up scores in a sample of 5,592 participants with a diverse sociodemographic profile, who were assessed twice during 4 years of follow-up. Methods: We tested two possible approaches to correct the retest effect and calculated the Reliable Change Index. Results: We observed increased scores at the follow-up assessment after 4 years, but the results indicate a modest occurrence of retest effects. The regression difference correction successfully generated follow-up corrected scores, while the mean difference did not provide effective corrections. Sociodemographic characteristics had a minor impact on the retest. Conclusions: We recommend the regression difference correction for retest effects. The absence of this methodological approach might lead to biased results using longitudinal cognitive scores.

Keywords