Proceedings (Feb 2018)

Controlling Density and Modulus in Auxetic Foam Fabrications—Implications for Impact and Indentation Testing

  • Olly Duncan,
  • Tom Allen,
  • Leon Foster,
  • Ruben Gatt,
  • Joseph N. Grima,
  • Andrew Alderson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060250
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 6
p. 250

Abstract

Read online

Foams are commonly used for cushioning in protective sporting equipment. Volumetrically compressing open-cell polyurethane foam buckles cell ribs creating a re-entrant structure—set by heating then cooling—which can impart auxetic behaviour. Theoretically, auxetic materials improve impact protection by increasing indentation resistance and energy absorption, potentially reducing sporting injuries and burdens on individuals, health services and national economies. In previous work, auxetic foam exhibited ~3 to ~8 times lower peak force (compared to its conventional counterpart) under impacts adopted from tests used to certify protective sporting equipment. Increases to the foam’s density and changes to stress/strain relationships (from fabrication) mean Poisson’s ratio’s contribution to reduced peak forces under impact is unclear. This work presents a simple fabrication method for foam samples with comparable density and linear stress/strain relationship, but different Poisson’s ratios ranging between 0.1 and −0.3, an important step in assessing the Poisson’s ratio’s contribution to impact force attenuation.

Keywords