Orthopedic Research and Reviews (Oct 2020)
Biologics to Improve Healing in Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Critical Review
Abstract
Brandon T Goldenberg,1 Lucca Lacheta,1,2 Travis J Dekker,3 James D Spratt,1 Philip C Nolte,1 Peter J Millett1,4 1Steadman-Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO 81657, USA; 2Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charitè Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eglin Air Force Base, Elgin, FL, USA; 4The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO 81657, USACorrespondence: Peter J Millett 181 West Meadow Drive Suite 1000, Vail, CO 81657, USATel +19704795876Fax +19704799753Email [email protected]: Large and massive rotator cuff tears have the highest risk of retear. Common biologic modalities that can potentially reduce the retear rate and improve healing include platelet-rich plasma (PRP), scaffolds, and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). PRP has been studied for its role in improving rotator cuff healing and results of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses show mixed results. Most studies in large and massivge tears show that PRP decreases the retear rate, but the connection between structural integrity and clinical outcomes is still unknown. Extracellular matrix (ECM) and synthetic scaffolds can increase healing in augmentation and bridging repair. Acellular dermal allografts have shown better healing rates and outcomes than xenografts in meta-analyses. Synthetic scaffolds augmented with bone marrow-derived stem cells have only been studied in vitro but are promising for the combination of mechanical stability and induction of a biological response. Superior capsule reconstruction is an exciting type of interposition graft reconstruction that has shown favorable early clinical outcomes for large and massive tears. Bone marrow-derived stem cells and adipose-derived stem cells improve the biomechanical characteristics of tendon repair and enhance the histological findings of the healing process in animal studies. However, evidence from human studies is lacking, especially in patients with large and massive tears. In summary, there are many biological options to augment rotator cuff repair in patients with large and massive tears. Due to mixed results and a lack of standardization in high-quality studies, we cannot recommend PRP at this time as an adjunct to rotator cuff repair. Both ECM and synthetic scaffolds, as well as SCR, can be used, especially in situations where native tendon is compromised, and additional mechanical augmentation is needed. Stem cells have been the least studied to date, so it is difficult to give recommendations for or against their use at this time.Keywords: biologics, large rotator cuff tears, massive rotator cuff tears, platelet-rich plasma, scaffolds, mesenchymal stem cells
