Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (Sep 2024)

Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban or low-molecular-weight heparin in non-major orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Lemei Zhu,
  • Bohua Zhu,
  • Pingping Bing,
  • Mingxu Qi,
  • Binsheng He

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05087-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Patients undergoing non-major orthopedic surgery often face an increased risk of venous thromboembolism due to the necessity of immobilization postoperatively. Current guidelines commonly recommend the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for prophylaxis, but it is associated with low patient compliance and certain side effects. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban or LMWH for thromboprophylaxis following non-major orthopedic surgery. Method Relevant literature was systematically searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase from their inception to October 1, 2023, to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban or LMWH in RCTs for thromboprophylaxis following non-major orthopedic surgery. Results A total of 5 randomized controlled trials involving 5,101 patients were included. There was no statistically significant difference in the preventive effect against venous thromboembolism (VTE) when using rivaroxaban or LMWH following non-major orthopedic surgery (RR 0.80; 95%CI 0.31 to 2.07). In terms of safety, there was also no statistically significant difference in the incidence of bleeding events in patients undergoing non-major orthopedic surgery when using rivaroxaban or LMWH (RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.76). Conclusion In non-major orthopedic surgery, the risk of venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications is similar when using rivaroxaban or LMWH.

Keywords