BJGP Open (Jun 2020)

Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on lung cancer screening in the UK: a qualitative study

  • Charikleia Margariti,
  • Maria Kordowicz,
  • Gillian Selman,
  • Arjun Nair,
  • Yvonne Akande,
  • Azhar Saleem,
  • Tiago Rua

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen20X101035
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

Background: Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been shown to decrease mortality. Low lung cancer survival rates in the UK, driven primarily by late-stage presentation, provide the impetus for implementing screening. Nascent guidance on screening in the UK recommends primary care case-finding. However, the potential impact and acceptability on primary care, and the opportunistic utilisation of other case-finding routes, such as pharmacies, smoking cessation services, and respiratory clinics, have not been fully explored. Aim: To explore healthcare professionals’ views and perspectives about lung cancer screening and their preparedness and willingness to be involved in its implementation. Design & setting: A qualitative study was carried out with semi-structured interviews conducted with GPs, pharmacists, staff from smoking cessation services within Southwark and Lambeth in London, and staff from respiratory clinics in Guys’ and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in London between April 2018 and December 2018. Method: Sixteen participants were interviewed and the interview transcripts were analysed thematically. Results: Participants described lung cancer screening as an important diagnostic tool for capturing lung cancer at an earlier stage and in increasing survivorship. However, the majority expressed a lack of awareness and understanding, uncertainty and concerns about the validity of screening, and the potential impact on their patients and workload. Conclusion: Study participants had mixed opinions about lung cancer screening and expressed their concerns about its implementation. Addressing these concerns by providing resources and effective and detailed guidelines for their use may lead to greater engagement and willingness to be involved in lung cancer screening.

Keywords