Cancer Medicine (Jul 2023)

Clinical outcomes after CPX‐351 in patients with high‐risk acute myeloid leukemia: A comparison with a matched cohort from the Spanish PETHEMA registry

  • Teresa Bernal,
  • Ainhoa Fernández Moreno,
  • Almudena de LaIglesia,
  • Celina Benavente,
  • Ana García‐Noblejas,
  • Daniel García Belmonte,
  • Rosalía Riaza,
  • Olga Salamero,
  • Maria Angeles Foncillas,
  • Alicia Roldán,
  • Víctor Noriega Concepción,
  • Laura Llorente González,
  • Juan Miguel Bergua Burgués,
  • Soraya Lorente de Uña,
  • Gabriela Rodríguez‐Macías,
  • Adolfo de la Fuente Burguera,
  • Maria José García Pérez,
  • Jose Luis López‐Lorenzo,
  • Pilar Martínez,
  • Concepción Aláez,
  • Marta Callejas,
  • Carmen Martínez‐Chamorro,
  • José Rifón Roca,
  • Lourdes Amador Barciela,
  • Armando V. Mena Durán,
  • Karoll Gómez Correcha,
  • Esperanza Lavilla Rubira,
  • María Luz Amigo,
  • Ferran Vall‐llovera,
  • Ana Garrido,
  • María García‐Fortes,
  • Dunia de Miguel Llorente,
  • Anastasia Aules Leonardo,
  • Carlos Cervero,
  • Rosa Coll Jordá,
  • Manuel M. Pérez‐Encinas,
  • Marta Polo Zarzuela,
  • Angela Figuera,
  • Guillermo Rad,
  • David Martínez‐Cuadrón,
  • Pau Montesinos

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6120
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 14
pp. 14892 – 14901

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background CPX‐351 is approved for the treatment of therapy related acute myeloid leukemia (t‐AML) and AML with myelodysplastic related changes (MRC‐AML). The benefits of this treatment over standard chemotherapy has not been addressed in well matched cohorts of real‐life patients. Methods Retrospective analysis of AML patients treated with CPX‐351 as per routine practice. A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare their main outcomes with those observed in a matched cohort among 765 historical patients receiving intensive chemotherapy (IC), all of them reported to the PETHEMA epidemiologic registry. Results Median age of 79 patients treated with CPX‐351 was 67 years old (interquartile range 62–71), 53 were MRC‐AML. The complete remission (CR) rate or CR without recovery (CRi) after 1 or 2 cycles of CPX‐351 was 52%, 60‐days mortality 18%, measurable residual disease <0.1% in 54% (12 out of 22) of them. Stem cell transplant (SCT) was performed in 27 patients (34%), median OS was 10.3 months, and 3‐year relapse incidence was 50%. Using PSM, we obtained two comparable cohorts treated with CPX‐351 (n = 52) or IC (n = 99), without significant differences in CR/CRi (60% vs. 54%) and median OS (10.3 months vs. 9.1 months), although more patients were bridged to SCT in the CPX‐351 group (35% vs. 12%). The results were confirmed when only 3 + 7 patients were included in the historical cohort. In multivariable analyses, SCT was associated with better OS (HR 0.33 95% CI: 0.18–0.59), p < 0.001. Conclusion Larger post‐authorization studies may provide evidence of the clinical benefits of CPX‐351 for AML in the real‐life setting.

Keywords