Annals of Hepatology (Nov 2024)

Efficacy and safety of palliative treatment in patients with autoimmune liver disease-associated hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Louisa Stern,
  • Constantin Schmidt,
  • Lorenz Kocheise,
  • Vincent Joerg,
  • Christian Casar,
  • Aurélie Walter,
  • Joost P.H. Drenth,
  • Maria Papp,
  • Nikolaos K. Gatselis,
  • Kalliopi Zachou,
  • Matthias Pinter,
  • Bernhard Scheiner,
  • Arndt Vogel,
  • Martha M. Kirstein,
  • Fabian Finkelmeier,
  • Oliver Waidmann,
  • Arndt Weinmann,
  • Piotr Milkiewicz,
  • Douglas Thorburn,
  • Neil Halliday,
  • Ana Lleo,
  • Samuel Huber,
  • George N. Dalekos,
  • Ansgar W. Lohse,
  • Henning Wege,
  • Johann von Felden,
  • Kornelius Schulze

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 29, no. 6
p. 101534

Abstract

Read online

Introduction and Objectives: Autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) are rare causes hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and data on the efficacy and tolerability of anti-tumor therapies are scarce. This pan-European study aimed to assess outcomes in AILD-HCC patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) compared with patients with more common HCC etiologies, including viral, alcoholic or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Materials and Methods: 107 patients with HCC-AILD (AIH:55; PBC:52) treated at 13 European centres between 1996 and 2020 were included. 65 received TACE and 28 received TKI therapy. 43 (66 %) were female (median age 73 years) with HCC tumor stage BCLC A (34 %), B (46 %), C (9 %) or D (11 %). For each treatment type, propensity score matching was used to match AILD to non-AILD-HCC on a 1:1 basis, yielding in a final cohort of 130 TACE and 56 TKI patients for comparative analyses of median overall survival (mOS) and treatment tolerability. Results: HCC-AILD patients showed comparable mOS to controls for both TACE (19.5 vs. 22.1 months, p = 0.9) and TKI (15.4 vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.5). Adverse events were less frequent in AILD-HCC patients than controls (33 % % vs. 62 %, p = 0.003). For TKIs, there were no significant differences in adverse events (73% vs. 86%, p = 0.2) or interruption rates (44% vs. 36 %, p = 0.7). Conclusions: In summary, this study demonstrates comparable mOS for AILD-HCC patients undergoing local and systemic treatments, with better tolerability than HCC of other causes. TKIs remain important therapeutic options for AILD-HCC patients, particularly given their exclusion from recent immunotherapy trials.