Frontiers in Nutrition (Jul 2024)

Associations between novel anthropometric indices and the prevalence of gallstones among 6,848 adults: a cross-sectional study

  • Jie Zhang,
  • Jie Zhang,
  • Jie Zhang,
  • Depeng Liang,
  • Depeng Liang,
  • Depeng Liang,
  • Lidong Xu,
  • Lidong Xu,
  • Lidong Xu,
  • Yanhong Liu,
  • Yanhong Liu,
  • Yanhong Liu,
  • Shan Jiang,
  • Shan Jiang,
  • Shan Jiang,
  • Xiaomeng Han,
  • Xiaomeng Han,
  • Xiaomeng Han,
  • Huili Wu,
  • Huili Wu,
  • Huili Wu,
  • Yuanyuan Jiang,
  • Yuanyuan Jiang,
  • Yuanyuan Jiang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1428488
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundTraditional anthropometric measures, including body mass index (BMI), are insufficient for evaluating gallstone risk. This study investigated the association between novel anthropometric indices and gallstone risk among 6,848 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the United States.MethodsMeasures calculated included weight (WT), BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WtHR), conicity index (CI), A Body Shape Index (ABSI), Body Roundness Index (BRI), Abdominal Volume Index (AVI), and Weight-adjusted Waist Index (WWI). Logistic regression and smooth curve fitting assessed the relationships between these indices and gallstones, complemented by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate their discriminative power.ResultsThe results indicated significant differences between study groups, with a positive and independent correlation identified between gallstones and all measures except ABSI. Specifically, per 1 SD increase in WC, WT, BMI, WtHR, and AVI was associated with a 57%, 59%, 52%, 53%, and 53% increased risk of gallstones, respectively. Dose-response analysis confirmed a positive correlation between these indices and gallstone risk. ROC analysis highlighted WtHR and BRI as having superior discriminative abilities (AUC = 0.6703). Further, among participants with a BMI < 30 kg/m2, elevated levels of WT, WtHR, CI, BRI, and WWI significantly increased the risk of gallstones (P < 0.001). Likewise, elevated BMI heightened the risk at low levels of WT, WC, WtHR, BRI, AVI, and CI (P < 0.001).ConclusionThis study supports the positive association between various anthropometric indicators and gallstones, recommending that newer anthropometric indices be considered more extensively to enhance gallstone prevention and treatment strategies.

Keywords