ACR Open Rheumatology (Sep 2023)

Distinct Fluorescence Optical Imaging Patient Clusters Emerge for Seropositive and Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis

  • Yogan Kisten,
  • Laurent Arnaud,
  • Adrian Levitsky,
  • Noémi Györi,
  • Per Larsson,
  • Aase Hensvold,
  • Anca Catrina,
  • Erik af Klint,
  • Hamed Rezaei

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11599
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 9
pp. 474 – 480

Abstract

Read online

Objective To investigate whether digital activity fluorescence optical imaging (FOI) patterns of inflammation can identify distinct rheumatoid arthritis (RA) phenotypes. Methods The hands of newly diagnosed patients with RA were evaluated by clinical examination, musculoskeletal ultrasound, and FOI. Inflammation on FOI was defined when capillary leakage and/or fluorophore perfusion was present. The FOI composite image was quantified into a digital disease activity (DACT) score, using novel computerized algorithms. Unsupervised clustering on FOI inflammatory patterns was used to identify subgroups of patients relative to anticyclic citrullinated peptides (ACPA) and/or rheumatoid factor (RF). Results Of 1326 examined hand joints in 39 patients with RA (72% female; 56% ever‐smokers; 54% RF positive and 69% ACPA positive), 400 (30%) showed inflammation by FOI, and 95% (37 of 39) of patients had DACT‐FOI scores greater than 1. Unsupervised analysis on FOI patterns revealed two patient clusters, cluster 1 (n = 29) and cluster 2 (n = 10). The proportion of seropositive patients was significantly higher in cluster 1 versus cluster 2 (90%, 26 of 29 vs. 30%, 3 of 10; P < 0.01), whereas C‐reactive‐protein levels (minimum‐maximum) were significantly higher in cluster 2 (20 mg/l [1‐102]) versus cluster 1 (2 mg/l [0‐119]; P = 0.01). A wider variety and proportion of inflamed joints emerged for patients with RA in cluster 2 versus cluster 1, in which inflammation was more concentrated around the wrists and the right metacarpophalangeal 2 (MCP2), bilateral MCP3, and, to a lesser degree, left MCP2 and proximal interphalangeal joint and tendon regions. Cluster 1 displayed lower mean (±SD) DACT scores compared with cluster 2 (3.6 ± 2.1 vs. 5.4 ± 2.1; P = 0.03). Conclusion FOI‐based digital quantification of hand joint inflammation revealed two distinct RA subpopulations with and without ACPA and RF related autoantibodies.