What exactly did Romanian post-war nationalism mean?

Balcanica. 2018;2018(49):183-188 DOI 10.2298/BALC1849183T

 

Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Balcanica

ISSN: 0350-7653 (Print); 2406-0801 (Online)

Publisher: Institute for Balkan Studies SASA

LCC Subject Category: History (General) and history of Europe: History of Balkan Peninsula

Country of publisher: Serbia

Language of fulltext: French, English

Full-text formats available: PDF

 

AUTHORS

Theodorescu Răzvan (Romanian Academy, International Association of South-East European Studies (AIESEE))

EDITORIAL INFORMATION

Double blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 25 weeks

 

Abstract | Full Text

In the last century nationalism as a spiritual element - according to the 1919 state­ment of the historian, archaeologist and philosopher Vasile Pârvan - was a blessed plant grown on Romanian soil during the ’48 revolution, the ’59 union under Prince Cuza, the ’77 war of independence and the preparation of such a national project as the Union with the Romanian Kingdom of several Romanian-speaking provinces dominated by two em­pires - the Austrian and the Russian - epitomized by Transylvania which came finally to the motherland on the 1st of December 1918, the same day when the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes was born. In the nationalism project, the Union Transylvania was a political priority. But we must add immediately that in the events of 1914-1916 in the neighbourhood of Romania a symbol of the national struggle became what Nicolae Iorga, in a famous lecture of 1915, called “the heroic and martyr Serbia”.