In Autumn 2020, DOAJ will be relaunching with a new website with updated functionality, improved search, and a simplified application form. More information is available on our blog. Our API is also changing.

Hide this message

A Critical Assessment of the Relationship between Imitation and Violence in Rene Girard’s View

Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī. 2018;20(77):219-242 DOI 10.22091/pfk.2018.1200

 

Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī

ISSN: 1735-9791 (Print); 2538-2500 (Online)

Publisher: University of Qom

LCC Subject Category: Philosophy. Psychology. Religion: Religions. Mythology. Rationalism: Philosophy of religion. Psychology of religion. Religion in relation to other subjects

Country of publisher: Iran, Islamic Republic of

Language of fulltext: Persian

Full-text formats available: PDF, XML

 

AUTHORS


Muhammad Husain Sadeqi (PhD student, Philosophy of Ethics, Theology College, University of Qom)

Habibollah Babaei Babaei (Assistant professor, Islamic Nations History and Civilization, Academy of Islamic Science and Culture)

EDITORIAL INFORMATION

Double blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 10 weeks

 

Abstract | Full Text

Girard considers imitation to be the main factor of violence by attributing violence to man’s nature. According to him, praising the role-model motivates imitation of the inclinations of the role-model in the praiser. This matter results in rivalry and violence between the imitator and role-model since imitation has the characteristic of transmission and is a contagion that fills all of society with violence. Imitation, apart from being a factor of violence, can also be a factor of its destruction; this destruction is sometimes temporary and is realized through the victim’s accusation and punishment (of the perpetrator) and is sometimes final and everlasting and is actualized through imitation of the Divine role-model (messiah). Based on the finding of this study, Girard’s Imitation Theory has considerable distinctions like studying the roots of violence in man’s nature and presenting a philosophical analysis of that, logical cohesion of the main points and the ability to explain the particular types of violence which other theories do not focus on. There are also flaws in this view, some of which are: the inability to provide a comprehensive explanation of violence and reducing to it to only one methodological factor and disorder.