Reliability of automated brain volumetric analysis: A test by comparing NeuroQuant and volBrain software

Abstract

Abstract Background and purpose Brain volume analysis from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is gaining an important role in neurological diagnosis. This study compares the volumes of brain segments measured by two automated brain analysis software, NeuroQuant (NQ), and volBrain (VB) in order to test their reliability in brain volumetry. Methods Using NQ and VB software, the same brain segment volumes were calculated and compared, taken from 56 patients scanned under the same MRI sequence. These segments were intracranial cavity, putamen, thalamus, amygdala, whole brain, cerebellum, white matter, and hippocampus. The paired t‐test method has been used to determine if there was a significant difference in these measurements. The interclass correlation (ICC) is used to test inter‐method reliability between the two software. Finally, regression analysis was used to examine the possibility of linear correlation. Results In all brain segments tested but hippocampus, significant differences were found. ICC presents satisfactory to excellent reliability in all brain segments except thalamus and amygdala for which reliability has been proven to be poor. In most cases, linear correlation was found. Conclusions The significant differences found in the majority of the tested brain segments are raising questions about the reliability of automated brain analysis as a quantitative tool. Strong linear correlation of the volumetric measurements and good reliability indicates that, each software provides good qualitative information of brain structures size.

Keywords

• atrophy
• brain
• comparison
• NeuroQuant
• volBrain
• volumetry