Saudi Dental Journal (Dec 2021)

Accuracy in positioning of dental X-ray images – A comparative study of a portable X-ray device and a wall-mounted device

  • Julian Lommen,
  • Lara Schorn,
  • Julia Nitschke,
  • Christoph Sproll,
  • Uwe Zeller,
  • Norbert R. Kübler,
  • Jörg Handschel,
  • Henrik Holtmann

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 33, no. 8
pp. 884 – 889

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: The benefits of portable dental X-ray devices remain controversially debated. This study aimed to compare the accuracy in positioning dental X-ray images using handheld (Nomad Pro 2) and wall-mounted (Heliodent Plus) X-ray devices. Materials and methods: Radiographical imaging was exercised on a maxillofacial phantom using the handheld dental X-ray device Nomad Pro 2 (Kavo Kerr, Biberach, Germany) and the wall-mounted dental X-ray device Heliodent Plus (Sirona Dental Systems, Bensheim, Germany). Accuracy of device positioning (i.e., centeredness and perpendicularity) was measured as horizontal and vertical deviation (pixels and millimeters) from a centrally positioned crosshair. The reproducibility of the results was tested for 80 images per device and operator. IBM SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analyses. Results: Centeredness of produced dental X-rays was significantly better for the wall-mounted device than for the handheld device in both deviation from the x-axis (p = 0.042) and y-axis (p = 0.020). The perpendicularity of the produced dental X-rays was significantly better for the handheld device than for the wall-mounted device for both horizontal (p < 0.001) and vertical (p < 0.001) plains. Conclusions: Handheld dental X-ray devices appear to provide a high degree of accuracy in image positioning, especially in regard to proper perpendicular image angulation.

Keywords