Environmental Research Letters (Jan 2022)

Sulfur isotopes reveal agricultural changes to the modern sulfur cycle

  • Anna L Hermes,
  • Todd E Dawson,
  • Eve-Lyn S Hinckley

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6683
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 5
p. 054032

Abstract

Read online

The environmental fates and consequences of intensive sulfur (S) applications to croplands are largely unknown. In this study, we used S stable isotopes to identify and trace agricultural S from field-to-watershed scales, an initial and timely step toward constraining the modern S cycle. We conducted our research within the Napa River Watershed, California, US, where vineyards receive frequent fungicidal S sprays. We measured soil and surface water sulfate concentrations ([SO _4 ^2− ]) and stable isotopes ( δ ^34 S–SO _4 ^2− ), which we refer to in combination as the ‘S fingerprint’. We compared samples collected from vineyards and surrounding forests/grasslands, which receive background atmospheric and geologic S sources. Vineyard δ ^34 S–SO _4 ^2− values were 9.9 ± 5.9‰ (median ± interquartile range), enriched by ∼10‰ relative to forests/grasslands (−0.28 ± 5.7‰). Vineyards also had roughly three-fold higher [SO _4 ^2− ] than forests/grasslands (13.6 and 5.0 mg SO _4 ^2− –S l ^−1 , respectively). Napa River δ ^34 S–SO _4 ^2− values, reflecting the watershed scale, were similar to those from vineyards (10.5 ± 7.0‰), despite vineyard agriculture constituting only ∼11% of the watershed area. Combined, our results provide important evidence that agricultural S is traceable at field-to-watershed scales, a critical step toward determining the consequences of agricultural alterations to the modern S cycle.

Keywords