Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open (Dec 2023)

Plastic Surgery Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Characteristics, Research Themes, and Predictors of Publication and Discontinuation

  • Sarthak Sinha, MD(C), PhD(C),
  • Rohit Arora, PhD(C),
  • Keerthana Chockalingam, BHSc(C),
  • Marieta van der Vyver, MD,
  • Brett Ponich, MD,
  • Athithan Ambikkumar, MD,
  • Myriam Verly, MD,
  • Madison Turk, MD(C), PhD(C),
  • Shyla Bharadia, MD(C),
  • Jeff Biernaskie, PhD,
  • Claire Temple-Oberle, MD, MSc, FRCSC,
  • Alan Robertson Harrop, MD, MSc, FRCSC,
  • Vincent Gabriel, MD, MSc, FRCPC

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005478
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 12
p. e5478

Abstract

Read online

Summary:. Clinical trials (CTs) are crucial for evidence-based surgical care. Despite growing interest in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) research, the status of PRS CTs remains unknown. We obtained PRS CTs from ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (November 2022). Topic modeling identified research themes and machine learning models generated CT-publication pairs. Kaplan-Meier curves visualized CT discontinuation and nonpublication. Of the 4685 PRS CTs identified, 79% were interventional and 81% recruited adults. Most were single-center-led (67%) and academic-funded (77%). Male investigators led 77% of CTs. Female-only patient CTs outnumbered male-only (31% versus 1%). The United States led with 41% of CTs, followed by France, Canada, and China. Industry-funded CTs were higher in the USA, Germany, and Belgium, and academic-funded in France, Canada, and China. PRS CTs clustered into aesthetics (43%), reconstructive (20%), wound healing (8%), peripheral nerve (6%), tumor excision (5%), craniofacial (5%), perioperative pain (5%), and burns (4%). Industry preferred funding aesthetics, whereas academia and industry co-funded wound healing. Publication rates of completed (24%) and terminated (10%) CTs varied by cluster, with perioperative pain CTs exhibiting higher rates. Industry-funded CTs had lower publication rates (hazard ratio: 0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.5–0.81) and higher discontinuation (hazard ratio: 1.34, confidence interval: 1.06–1.68) driven by sponsors’ decision to terminate prematurely. Global growth in PRS trialome reflects rising interest in evidence-based plastic surgery. Yet, imbalances in participant age, geography, funding source, and trial design influence likelihood of CT discontinuation and publication. Key research gaps include pediatric CTs, accountability in industry-funded research, and multicenter collaborations with underrepresented regions.