Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias (Jan 2007)

<title language="eng">Caracterización molecular de tres líneas de Cavia porcellus mediante la aplicación de AFLP

  • Carlos Solarte-Portilla,
  • Heiber Cárdenas-Henao,
  • Carol Rosero-Galindo,
  • William Burgos-Paz

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 1
pp. 49 – 58

Abstract

Read online

Los marcadores moleculares son una herramienta eficaz para determinar variabilidad genética entre y dentro de poblaciones, pero en el caso de Cavia porcellus, no existen reportes referentes al uso de estas técnicas. Con los marcadores moleculares AFLP´s (Amplified Fragment Length Polimorphism), se analizaron tres poblaciones, dos criollas y una mejorada genéticamente, sometida a selección durante varias generaciones y obtenida a partir del cruzamiento entre animales peruanos y nativos de Nariño. Para obtener los marcadores moleculares AFLP´s (Amplified Fragment Lenght Polimorphism), se utilizaron en total cinco combinaciones de cebadores, tres combinaciones recomendadas para el orden Rodenthia y dos por la casa fabricante del Kit, de las cuales sólo una de ellas, con 116 loci, permitió establecer diferencias entre las poblaciones estudiadas, de acuerdo con el valor de distancia genética insesgada de Nei (pMolecular markers are a powerful tool to determine genetic variability within and among populations, but for the Cavia porcellus there are no reports on the use of these techniques. Three populations, two native and another one, genetically improved which was obtained by crossing native and Peruvian animals and submitted to genetic selection through several generations were analyzed by means of AFLP markers. Five primer’s combinations recommended for Rodenthia were used, but only one allowed to establish significant differences (p<0.01) according to unbiased Nei´s distance Value. Both native populations were grouped in a cluster genetically distant from the genetically improved animals. This showed that foreign animals absorbed the native populations. The average heterosigosity between 0.48% and 14.48% and the percentage of polymorphisms between 0.00% and 39.65% allow to conclude that there was a low variability between the populations, but the population genetically improved was the most polymorphic. The low variability within the improved animals it can be explained because of the intensive selection procedures use with them, whereas within the native populations can be explained because of their very low populations effective size. These results suggest that there is a need to restate the genetic improvement and preservation programs of the native Cavia porcellus in the southwest region of Colombia.

Keywords