BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care (Jul 2023)

Diabetic Retinopathy Screening at the Point of Care (DR SPOC): detecting undiagnosed and vision-threatening retinopathy by integrating portable technologies within existing services

  • Lisa Keay,
  • Gerald Liew,
  • Adrian T Fung,
  • Ngai Wah Cheung,
  • Tien-Ming Hng,
  • Christian M Girgis,
  • Glen Maberly,
  • Helen Nguyen,
  • Andrew J White,
  • Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz,
  • Lakni Shahanika Weerasinghe,
  • Hamish Paul Dunn,
  • Daminda P Weerasinghe,
  • Helen Do,
  • Alison Pryke,
  • Samuel I Marks,
  • Rajini Jayaballa,
  • Seema Gurung,
  • Belinda Ford,
  • Ramy H Bishay

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003376
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Introduction The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a low socioeconomic region of a high-income country, as well as determine the diagnostic utility of point-of-care screening for high-risk populations in tertiary care settings.Research design and methods This was a cross-sectional study of patients with diabetes attending foot ulcer or integrated care diabetes clinics at two Western Sydney hospitals (n=273). DR was assessed using portable, two-field, non-mydriatic fundus photography and combined electroretinogram/ pupillometry (ERG). With mydriatic photographs used as the reference standard, sensitivity and specificity of the devices were determined. Prevalence of DR and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) were reported, with multivariate logistic regression used to identify predictors of DR.Results Among 273 patients, 39.6% had any DR, while 15.8% had VTDR, of whom 59.3% and 62.8% were previously undiagnosed, respectively. Non-mydriatic photography demonstrated 20.2% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity for any DR, with a 56.7% screening failure rate. Meanwhile, mydriatic photography produced high-quality images with a 7.6% failure rate. ERG demonstrated 72.5% sensitivity and 70.1% specificity, with a 15.0% failure rate. The RETeval ERG was noted to have an optimal DR cut-off score at 22. Multivariate logistic regression identified an eGFR of ≤29 mL/min/1.73 m2, HbA1c of ≥7.0%, pupil size of <4 mm diameter, diabetes duration of 5–24 years and RETeval score of ≥22 as strong predictors of DR.Conclusion There is a high prevalence of vision-threatening and undiagnosed DR among patients attending high-risk tertiary clinics in Western Sydney. Point-of-care DR screening using portable, mydriatic photography demonstrates potential as a model of care which is easily accessible, targeted for high-risk populations and substantially enhances DR detection.