An Unknown Case of Speech Encryption

Abstract

Profoundly autistic man Tito Mukhopadhyay has been presented as the perfection of the perfection of autism treatment. A cure for autism has of course never been devised. And no one even knows what kind of treatment could even possibly cure autism, because no one knows what the neurological mechanism of autism is. However, I demonstrate that Tito’s communication therapist engaged in multifaceted communicative deception with him during the 2003 – 2017 extensive nationally televised presentations of the therapists’ communicative method. The therapist is Soma Mukhopadhyay, who also is Tito’s mother. It was not known that she was using a speech encryption method, nor other methods of deception. However, from the outset there was suspicion among a vast array of scientists, clinicians, etc., that she was, somehow, responsible for Tito’s written communications. However, despite that they analyzed Soma’s presentations with Tito, and published journal-articles on the “absence of evidence” that Tito, himself, was communicating, they were not able to auditorily observe the speech encryption, nor visually observe and auditorily observe the other methods of deception. That is, they were not able to observe “proof of deception”. “Absence of evidence” and “proof of deception” are of course different. In 2008, a team of scientists who studied Soma and Tito for over 1 year, including the renowned Michael Merzenich, and in 2011 the renowned Oliver Sacks, concluded that there is an abundance of evidence that Tito himself is able to communicate via writing. However, I demonstrate that there is an abundance of proof of deception, and that Sacks, Merzenich, etc., were not able to observe the speech encryption and other methods of deception. (This article consists of revisions and a correction of my 2021 article).

Keywords

• autism
• speech encryption