BMC Immunology (Jun 2005)

Standardization of cytokine flow cytometry assays

  • Cox Josephine,
  • Kuta Ellen,
  • Maila Hazel,
  • Alter Gailet,
  • El-Bahi Sophia,
  • Calarota Sandra,
  • Punt Kara,
  • Suni Maria A,
  • Sinclair Elizabeth,
  • Epling C Lorrie,
  • Lamoreaux Laurie,
  • Ottinger Janet,
  • Holbrook Jennifer,
  • Baker Megan,
  • Baydo Ruth,
  • Frank Ian,
  • Harari Alexandre,
  • Garcia Miguel,
  • Anzala Omu,
  • Birungi Josephine,
  • Hayes Peter,
  • Landry Claire,
  • Roig Eva,
  • Darden Janice,
  • D'Souza Patricia,
  • Rinfret Aline,
  • Maecker Holden T,
  • Gray Clive,
  • Altfeld Marcus,
  • Nougarede Nolwenn,
  • Boyer Jean,
  • Tussey Lynda,
  • Tobery Timothy,
  • Bredt Barry,
  • Roederer Mario,
  • Koup Richard,
  • Maino Vernon C,
  • Weinhold Kent,
  • Pantaleo Giuseppe,
  • Gilmour Jill,
  • Horton Helen,
  • Sekaly Rafick P

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-6-13
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 1
p. 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Cytokine flow cytometry (CFC) or intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) can quantitate antigen-specific T cell responses in settings such as experimental vaccination. Standardization of ICS among laboratories performing vaccine studies would provide a common platform by which to compare the immunogenicity of different vaccine candidates across multiple international organizations conducting clinical trials. As such, a study was carried out among several laboratories involved in HIV clinical trials, to define the inter-lab precision of ICS using various sample types, and using a common protocol for each experiment (see additional files online). Results Three sample types (activated, fixed, and frozen whole blood; fresh whole blood; and cryopreserved PBMC) were shipped to various sites, where ICS assays using cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 peptide mix or control antigens were performed in parallel in 96-well plates. For one experiment, antigens and antibody cocktails were lyophilised into 96-well plates to simplify and standardize the assay setup. Results (CD4+cytokine+ cells and CD8+cytokine+ cells) were determined by each site. Raw data were also sent to a central site for batch analysis with a dynamic gating template. Mean inter-laboratory coefficient of variation (C.V.) ranged from 17–44% depending upon the sample type and analysis method. Cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) yielded lower inter-lab C.V.'s than whole blood. Centralized analysis (using a dynamic gating template) reduced the inter-lab C.V. by 5–20%, depending upon the experiment. The inter-lab C.V. was lowest (18–24%) for samples with a mean of >0.5% IFNγ + T cells, and highest (57–82%) for samples with a mean of Conclusion ICS assays can be performed by multiple laboratories using a common protocol with good inter-laboratory precision, which improves as the frequency of responding cells increases. Cryopreserved PBMC may yield slightly more consistent results than shipped whole blood. Analysis, particularly gating, is a significant source of variability, and can be reduced by centralized analysis and/or use of a standardized dynamic gating template. Use of pre-aliquoted lyophilized reagents for stimulation and staining can provide further standardization to these assays.