PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Comparative evaluation of cerebral gliomas using rCBV measurements during sequential acquisition of T1-perfusion and T2*-perfusion MRI.

  • Jitender Saini,
  • Rakesh Kumar Gupta,
  • Manoj Kumar,
  • Anup Singh,
  • Indrajit Saha,
  • Vani Santosh,
  • Manish Beniwal,
  • Thennarasu Kandavel,
  • Marc Van Cauteren

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215400
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 4
p. e0215400

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveTo assess the inter-technique agreement of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) measurements obtained using T1- and T2*-perfusion MRI on 3T scanner in glioma patients.MethodsA total of 49 adult patients with gliomas underwent both on T1- and T2*-perfusion in the same scanning session, and rCBV maps were estimated using both methods. For the quantitative analysis; Two independent observers recorded the rCBV values from the tumor as well as contralateral brain tissue from both T1- and T2*-perfusion. Inter-observer and inter-technique rCBV measurement agreement were determined by using 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) statistics.ResultsQualitative analysis of the conventional and perfusion images showed that 16/49 (32.65%) tumors showed high susceptibility, and in these patients T2*-perfusion maps were suboptimal. Bland-Altman plots revealed an agreement between two independent observers recorded rCBV values for both T1- and T2*-perfusion. The ICC demonstrated strong agreement between rCBV values recorded by two observers for both T2* (ICC = 0.96, p = 0.040) and T1 (ICC = 0.97, p = 0.026) perfusion and similarly, good agreement was noted between rCBV estimated using two methods (ICC = 0.74, PConclusionsIn the current study, T1- and T2*-perfusion showed similar diagnostic performance for discrimination of grade III and grade IV gliomas; however, T1-perfusion was found to be better for the evaluation of tumors with intratumoral hemorrhage, postoperative recurrent tumors, and lesions near skull base. We conclude that T1-perfusion MRI with a single dose of contrast could be used as an alternative to T2*-perfusion to overcome the issues associated with this technique in brain tumors for reliable perfusion quantification.