Animals (Apr 2022)

Treatment and Outcomes of Tusk Fractures in Managed African Savanna and Asian Elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i> and <i>Elephas maximus</i>) across Five Continents

  • Josephine B. Rose,
  • Austin Leeds,
  • Linda M. Yang,
  • Rachel LeMont,
  • Melissa A. Fayette,
  • Jeffry S. Proudfoot,
  • Michelle R. Bowman,
  • Allison Woody,
  • James Oosterhuis,
  • David A. Fagan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091125
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 9
p. 1125

Abstract

Read online

Elephant tusk fractures are a clinical challenge that can impact the overall health of the animal, particularly when they result in pulp exposure. An international survey was sent to veterinarians to understand individual fracture characteristics and management strategies as they relate to outcomes, with the goal of better informing treatment procedures. The data set consisted of 79 fractures from 64 elephants (including Asian and African males and females), 44.3% of which were Class III fractures with pulpal involvement. Of this subset, pulp canal exposures of >0.5 cm were 23.8-fold more likely to develop pulpitis than fractures with <0.5 cm exposed, though canal size did not impact healing versus extraction outcome. Odds ratios showed that treatments including endodontics were 12.0-fold more likely to heal than tusks treated exclusively with medical management, though no association was observed in reducing the risk of pulpitis. Further, pulpitis was 7.58-fold more likely to develop when tap water was used to rinse exposed pulpal tissue; a finding that merits further investigation. The use of endodontic treatment versus medical management alone was significantly associated with improved recovery outcomes (i.e., reduced risk of extraction) in tusk fractures with pulpal involvement.

Keywords