Does the management of patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) changes with advanced diagnostic workup beyond coronary angiography? Results from the “Evaluation of the clinical Profile, Investigations and Cardiac Imaging of the Patients with MINOCA (EPIC-MINOCA Study)”

Abstract

Abstract Background Evaluation of the patients with MINOCA and identifying the underlying aetiology remains challenging. However, investigation in most patients remains limited to coronary angiography (CAG). The study aimed to assess the clinical profile, investigations and cardiac imaging of the patients with MINOCA and its outcomes. Results Out of 55 patients with MINOCA, CAG was normal in 16 (29.1%), while 39 (69.9%) had nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Of 55 patients, 34 had limited workup (Group 1) and only 21 had advanced workup (Group 2). In comparison to Group 1, Group 2 had a significantly higher association with the identification of possible underlying aetiology (16 vs. 4, p < 0.001) and a change in the management (10 vs. 3, p = 0.002). Conclusion Diagnostic workup in patients with MINOCA was limited to CAG in 61.8% of patients in this study. However, patients with advanced workup had a significantly higher association with the change in the treatment and identifying possible underlying aetiology in such patients.

Keywords

• MINOCA
• Intravascular imaging
• Cardiac imaging
• Myocardial infarction