E3S Web of Conferences (Jan 2021)

Optimization of the parameters of a partially regular microrelief by vibration rolling method

  • Talamanov Valeriy,
  • Kozenkova Galina,
  • Kozenkov Vladimir,
  • Kondratyev Sergey,
  • Heckert Evgeniy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202132600017
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 326
p. 00017

Abstract

Read online

Experience of operating machines shows that their quality depends on the nature of the contact of mating parts. The irregular nature of the surface microrelief, which is due to traditional treatment methods used, arises difficulties in solving three main problems of microgeometry optimization: reliable, theoretically substantiated normalization, technological support, accurate measurement and control. This determined the direction in solving the problem of increasing the accuracy and reliability of the surface quality normalization, that is the microrelief normalization. At present, there are a large number of technological methods for surface treatment aimed to form a regular microrelief on it. One of the most common and studied methods for the regular microrelief formation is the vibration rolling method based on thin plastic deformation of the surface metal layers and a complex relative displacement of the treated surface and the deforming element. Significant progress in the surface quality normalization was achieved after the introduction of GOST 24773-81, the standard for regular microreliefs. For example, the nomenclature of parameters and characteristics of partially regular microreliefs includes the relative area occupied by regular inhomogeneities FH. FH is a value expressed as a percentage of the area occupied by regular inhomogeneities to the area of the treated surface. If FH is determined for the 2A·Sk area within the boundaries of a microrelief element at different axial steps of regular inhomogeneities, the microgeometry of a partially regular microrelief can be described ambiguously. To avoid this, it is necessary to consider the multiplicity of the ratio of the amplitude A to the axial step So.