Direct oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation and heart valve surgery—a meta-analysis and systematic review

Abstract

Aims: Oral anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) could provide an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing bioprosthetic heart valve replacement or valve repair. Methods and results: The aim of this meta-analysis was to review the safety and efficacy of DOAC in patients with surgical implanted bioprosthetic heart valves or valve repairs and AF including data from six clinical trials with a total of 1,857 patients. The efficacy and safety data of DOAC and VKA were pooled to perform random-effects meta-analyses using the Mantel–Haenszel method with pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to assess statistical robustness. Death caused by cardiovascular cause or thromboembolic events were comparable (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.42–1.08; p = 0.10) as DOAC significantly reduced the risk for major bleeding (RR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.35–0.88; p = 0.01) and thromboembolic stroke or systemic embolism rates (RR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.32–0.90; p = 0.02). Rates for intracranial bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.07–0.99; p = 0.05) show a trend toward fewer events in the DOAC group. Outcomes for major or minor bleeding events and all-cause mortality were comparable for DOAC and VKA. Conclusion: Cumulative data analysis reveals that DOAC may provide an effective and safe alternative to VKA in patients with AF after surgically implanted bioprosthetic heart valves or repair with AF. Within a relatively heterogeneous study population, this meta-analysis shows a risk reduction of major bleedings and thromboembolic stroke or systemic embolisms for DOAC.