PLoS ONE (Jan 2013)

Reassessment of the unique mode of binding between angiotensin II type 1 receptor and their blockers.

  • Shin-Ichiro Miura,
  • Naoki Nakao,
  • Hiroyuki Hanzawa,
  • Yoshino Matsuo,
  • Keijiro Saku,
  • Sadashiva S Karnik

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079914
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 11
p. e79914

Abstract

Read online

While the molecular structures of angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers (ARBs) are very similar, they are also slightly different. Although each ARB has been shown to exhibit a unique mode of binding to AT1 receptor, different positions of the AT1 receptor have been analyzed and computational modeling has been performed using different crystal structures for the receptor as a template and different kinds of software. Therefore, we systematically analyzed the critical positions of the AT1 receptor, Tyr(113), Tyr(184), Lys(199), His(256) and Gln(257) using a mutagenesis study, and subsequently performed computational modeling of the binding of ARBs to AT1 receptor using CXCR4 receptor as a new template and a single version of software. The interactions between Tyr(113) in the AT1 receptor and the hydroxyl group of olmesartan, between Lys(199) and carboxyl or tetrazole groups, and between His(256) or Gln(257) and the tetrazole group were studied. The common structure, a tetrazole group, of most ARBs similarly bind to Lys(199), His(256) and Gln(257) of AT1 receptor. Lys(199) in the AT1 receptor binds to the carboxyl group of EXP3174, candesartan and azilsartan, whereas oxygen in the amidecarbonyl group of valsartan may bind to Lys(199). The benzimidazole portion of telmisartan may bind to a lipophilic pocket that includes Tyr(113). On the other hand, the n-butyl group of irbesartan may bind to Tyr(113). In conclusion, we confirmed that the slightly different structures of ARBs may be critical for binding to AT1 receptor and for the formation of unique modes of binding.