Allergy & Rhinology (Sep 2019)

Failure Pressures of Dural Repairs in a Porcine Ex Vivo Model: Novel Use of Titanium Clips Versus Tissue Glue

  • Kevin Chorath BS,
  • Mason Krysinski MD,
  • Leonid Bunegin BS,
  • Jacob Majors MD,
  • Erik Kent Weitzel MD,
  • Kevin Christopher McMains MD,
  • Philip G. Chen MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656719879677
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

Objective Endoscopic skull base surgery is advancing, and it is important to have reliable methods to repair the resulting defect. The objective of this study was to determine the failure pressures of 2 commonly used methods to repair large dural defects: collagen matrix underlay with fibrin glue and collagen matrix underlay with polyethylene glue, as well as a novel repair method: fascia lata with nonpenetrating titanium vascular clips. Methods The failure pressure of the 3 dural repairs was determined in a closed testing apparatus. Defects in porcine dura were created and collagen matrix grafts were used as an underlay followed by either fibrin glue (FG/CMG) or polyethylene glycol glue (PEG/CMG). A third condition using a segment of fascia lata was positioned flush with the edges of the dural defect and secured with titanium clips (TC/FL). Saline was infused to simulate increasing intracranial pressure (ICP) applied to the undersurface of the grafts until the repairs failed. Results The mean failure pressure of the PEG/CMG repair was 34.506 ± 14.822 cm H 2 O, FG/CMG was 12.413 ± 5.114 cm H 2 O, and TC/FL was 8.330 ± 3.483 cm H 2 O. There were statistically significant differences in mean failure pressures among the 3 repair methods. Conclusion In this ex vivo model comparing skull base repairs’ ability to withstand cerebrospinal fluid leak, the repairs that utilized PEG/CMG tolerated the greatest amount of pressure and was the only repair that exceeded normal physiologic ICP’s. Repair methods utilizing glues generally tolerated higher pressures compared to the novel repair using clips alone.