Remote Sensing (Feb 2024)

Spatiotemporal Changes of Center Pivot Irrigation Farmland in the Mu Us Region and Its Impact on the Surrounding Vegetation Growth

  • Zebang Song,
  • Jiaqiang Du,
  • Lijuan Li,
  • Xiaoqian Zhu,
  • Fangfang Chong,
  • Guangqing Zhai,
  • Luyao Wu,
  • Xiya Chen,
  • Jing Han

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16030569
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 3
p. 569

Abstract

Read online

Accurately understanding the distribution and changing trends of Center Pivot Irrigation (CPI) farmland in the Mu Us region and exploring the impact of CPI farmland construction on sandy land vegetation growth hold significant importance for local sustainable development. By using Landsat images to extract CPI farmland information and applying buffer zone analysis to explore the impact of CPI farmland construction on the surrounding vegetation growth, the results revealed the following key findings: (1) The number and area of CPI farmland units showed a continuous growth trend from 2008 to 2022. Spatially, Etoke Front Banner was the focal point of the CPI farmland unit construction, gradually expanding outward. In terms of scale, small-scale CPI farmland units (0–0.2 km2) dominated, while large-scale CPI farmland units (>0.4 km2) were primarily distributed in Yulin City (Mu Us). (2) The growth rate of CPI farmland units in Yulin City gradually slowed down, while that in Ordos City (Mu Us) continued to exhibit a high growth trend. Affected by water-resource pressure and policies, CPI farmland units in Ordos City may continue to increase in the future, while they may stop growing or even show a downward trend in Yulin City. (3) CPI farmland mainly came from the conversion of cultivated land, but over time, more and more grassland was reclaimed as CPI farmland. The absence of cover planting after crop harvesting and the lack of shelterbelt construction may exacerbate land desertification in the region. (4) Within the typical region, CPI farmland unit construction promoted vegetation growth within the CPI units and the 500 m buffer zone but had an inhibitory effect on vegetation growth within the 500–3000 m buffer zone and no significant effect on vegetation growth within the 3000–5000 m buffer zone. (5) The decrease in groundwater reserves caused by CPI farmland unit construction was the primary reason for inhibiting the vegetation growth within the 500–3000 m buffer zone of CPI farmland units in the Mu Us region. This study can provide a scientific basis for the sustainable development of CPI farmland in semi-arid areas.

Keywords